[pca] Failed (no Sun Online Account data)

[Wei.Gao at dot.gov]

Yes.  I was able to download those failed patches manually from sunsolve. 

________________________________

From: pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at on behalf of Asif Iqbal
Sent: Mon 11/9/2009 10:42 PM
To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
Subject: Re: [pca] Failed (no Sun Online Account data)


On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:39 PM, <Wei.Gao at dot.gov> wrote:


	Thanks Derek for your response.  My Sun account has a valid support
	contract and I should be entitled to all the patches.  I tried pca -a
	and got the same error message.  I just don't understand why 10 patches
	were downloaded successfully but 72 failed.  Does anybody else have the
	same problem?  How do find out what's wrong here?
	
	


can you download any of those failed patch manually from sunsolve? 





	-----Original Message-----
	From: pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at
	[mailto:pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at] On Behalf Of Derek Terveer
	Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 4:57 PM
	To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
	Subject: Re: [pca] Failed (no Sun Online Account data)
	
	Probably 10 were public patches and 72 required the account.  Try
	running pca with -a to prompt you for your account login/password.
	
	derek
	
	On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 04:55:28PM -0500, Wei.Gao at dot.gov wrote:
	> I haven't used pca for 4-5 months.  Today I updated pca and ran "pca
	-d
	> missingrs" to download the patches for my Solaris 10 x86 system.  72
	out
	> of 82 patches failed to download (Failed (no Sun Online Account data).
	> Please see below.  My Sun Solve account has valid contracts that
	entitle
	> me to all Solaris patches.  I am not sure why 10 of these patches were
	> successfully downloaded but 72 failed.  Does anyone else have the same
	> issue?  Please advise.  Thank you.
	>
	>
	>
	> Wei
	>
	>
	>
	>
	------------------------------------------------------------------------
	> ------
	>
	> 139100 01 < 02 RS- 199 SunOS 5.10_x86: gtar patch
	>
	>
	>
	> Looking for 139100-02 (48/82)
	>
	> Trying http://10.22.44.47:2020/cgi-bin/pca-proxy.cgi?
	>
	> Done
	>
	>
	------------------------------------------------------------------------
	> ------
	>
	> 140797 -- < 01 R-- 184 SunOS 5.10_x86: umountall patch
	>
	>
	>
	> Looking for 140797-01 (49/82)
	>
	> Trying http://10.22.44.47:2020/cgi-bin/pca-proxy.cgi?
	>
	> Failed
	>
	> Failed (no Sun Online Account data)
	>
	> Failed (patch not found)
	>
	>
	------------------------------------------------------------------------
	> ------
	>
	> 142530 -- < 01 RS-  14 SunOS 5.10_x86: uptime w utmp_update whodo
	patch
	>
	>
	>
	> Looking for 142530-01 (82/82)
	>
	> Trying http://10.22.44.47:2020/cgi-bin/pca-proxy.cgi?
	>
	> Failed
	>
	> Failed (no Sun Online Account data)
	>
	> Failed (patch not found)
	>
	> ..................
	>
	> ..................
	>
	> ..................
	>
	>
	------------------------------------------------------------------------
	> ------
	>
	> Download Summary: 82 total, 10 successful, 0 skipped, 72 failed
	>
	>
	>
	
	--
	Een goed begin is het halve werk!
	
	Derek Terveer
	Sun Microsystems (JAVA), Unix Administrator
	<derek.terveer at sun.com>  651-554-1504  x54404
	
	
	




-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu/> 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?