[pca] Failed (no Sun Online Account data)

[Asif Iqbal]

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:39 PM, <Wei.Gao at dot.gov> wrote:

> Thanks Derek for your response.  My Sun account has a valid support
> contract and I should be entitled to all the patches.  I tried pca -a
> and got the same error message.  I just don't understand why 10 patches
> were downloaded successfully but 72 failed.  Does anybody else have the
> same problem?  How do find out what's wrong here?
>
>
can you download any of those failed patch manually from sunsolve?



> Regards,
>
> Wei Gao
> Information Technology Specialist
> Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
> U.S. Department of Transportation
> 617-494-2238
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at
> [mailto:pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at] On Behalf Of Derek Terveer
> Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 4:57 PM
> To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
> Subject: Re: [pca] Failed (no Sun Online Account data)
>
> Probably 10 were public patches and 72 required the account.  Try
> running pca with -a to prompt you for your account login/password.
>
> derek
>
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 04:55:28PM -0500, Wei.Gao at dot.gov wrote:
> > I haven't used pca for 4-5 months.  Today I updated pca and ran "pca
> -d
> > missingrs" to download the patches for my Solaris 10 x86 system.  72
> out
> > of 82 patches failed to download (Failed (no Sun Online Account data).
> > Please see below.  My Sun Solve account has valid contracts that
> entitle
> > me to all Solaris patches.  I am not sure why 10 of these patches were
> > successfully downloaded but 72 failed.  Does anyone else have the same
> > issue?  Please advise.  Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > Wei
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
> >
> > 139100 01 < 02 RS- 199 SunOS 5.10_x86: gtar patch
> >
> >
> >
> > Looking for 139100-02 (48/82)
> >
> > Trying http://10.22.44.47:2020/cgi-bin/pca-proxy.cgi?
> >
> > Done
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
> >
> > 140797 -- < 01 R-- 184 SunOS 5.10_x86: umountall patch
> >
> >
> >
> > Looking for 140797-01 (49/82)
> >
> > Trying http://10.22.44.47:2020/cgi-bin/pca-proxy.cgi?
> >
> > Failed
> >
> > Failed (no Sun Online Account data)
> >
> > Failed (patch not found)
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
> >
> > 142530 -- < 01 RS-  14 SunOS 5.10_x86: uptime w utmp_update whodo
> patch
> >
> >
> >
> > Looking for 142530-01 (82/82)
> >
> > Trying http://10.22.44.47:2020/cgi-bin/pca-proxy.cgi?
> >
> > Failed
> >
> > Failed (no Sun Online Account data)
> >
> > Failed (patch not found)
> >
> > ..................
> >
> > ..................
> >
> > ..................
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
> >
> > Download Summary: 82 total, 10 successful, 0 skipped, 72 failed
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Een goed begin is het halve werk!
>
> Derek Terveer
> Sun Microsystems (JAVA), Unix Administrator
> <derek.terveer at sun.com>  651-554-1504  x54404
>
>
>


-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.univie.ac.at/mailman/private/pca/attachments/20091109/1ec5827e/attachment-0001.html