[pca] Failed (no Sun Online Account data)

[Asif Iqbal]

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:57 PM, <Wei.Gao at dot.gov> wrote:

> Yes.  I was able to download those failed patches manually from sunsolve.
>
>
could be something wrong with your proxy. it should not say no sun online
account.

you may want to post a verbose output for more help


> ________________________________
>
> From: pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at on behalf of Asif Iqbal
> Sent: Mon 11/9/2009 10:42 PM
> To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
> Subject: Re: [pca] Failed (no Sun Online Account data)
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:39 PM, <Wei.Gao at dot.gov> wrote:
>
>
>        Thanks Derek for your response.  My Sun account has a valid support
>        contract and I should be entitled to all the patches.  I tried pca
> -a
>        and got the same error message.  I just don't understand why 10
> patches
>        were downloaded successfully but 72 failed.  Does anybody else have
> the
>        same problem?  How do find out what's wrong here?
>
>
>
>
> can you download any of those failed patch manually from sunsolve?
>
>
>
>
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>        From: pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at
>        [mailto:pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at] On Behalf Of Derek Terveer
>        Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 4:57 PM
>        To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
>        Subject: Re: [pca] Failed (no Sun Online Account data)
>
>        Probably 10 were public patches and 72 required the account.  Try
>        running pca with -a to prompt you for your account login/password.
>
>        derek
>
>        On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 04:55:28PM -0500, Wei.Gao at dot.gov wrote:
>        > I haven't used pca for 4-5 months.  Today I updated pca and ran
> "pca
>        -d
>        > missingrs" to download the patches for my Solaris 10 x86 system.
>  72
>        out
>        > of 82 patches failed to download (Failed (no Sun Online Account
> data).
>        > Please see below.  My Sun Solve account has valid contracts that
>        entitle
>        > me to all Solaris patches.  I am not sure why 10 of these patches
> were
>        > successfully downloaded but 72 failed.  Does anyone else have the
> same
>        > issue?  Please advise.  Thank you.
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        > Wei
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>        > ------
>        >
>        > 139100 01 < 02 RS- 199 SunOS 5.10_x86: gtar patch
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        > Looking for 139100-02 (48/82)
>        >
>        > Trying http://10.22.44.47:2020/cgi-bin/pca-proxy.cgi?
>        >
>        > Done
>        >
>        >
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>        > ------
>        >
>        > 140797 -- < 01 R-- 184 SunOS 5.10_x86: umountall patch
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        > Looking for 140797-01 (49/82)
>        >
>        > Trying http://10.22.44.47:2020/cgi-bin/pca-proxy.cgi?
>        >
>        > Failed
>        >
>        > Failed (no Sun Online Account data)
>        >
>        > Failed (patch not found)
>        >
>        >
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>        > ------
>        >
>        > 142530 -- < 01 RS-  14 SunOS 5.10_x86: uptime w utmp_update whodo
>        patch
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        > Looking for 142530-01 (82/82)
>        >
>        > Trying http://10.22.44.47:2020/cgi-bin/pca-proxy.cgi?
>        >
>        > Failed
>        >
>        > Failed (no Sun Online Account data)
>        >
>        > Failed (patch not found)
>        >
>        > ..................
>        >
>        > ..................
>        >
>        > ..................
>        >
>        >
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>        > ------
>        >
>        > Download Summary: 82 total, 10 successful, 0 skipped, 72 failed
>        >
>        >
>        >
>
>        --
>        Een goed begin is het halve werk!
>
>        Derek Terveer
>        Sun Microsystems (JAVA), Unix Administrator
>        <derek.terveer at sun.com>  651-554-1504  x54404
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Asif Iqbal
> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu/>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.univie.ac.at/mailman/private/pca/attachments/20091109/af416f69/attachment.html