[PLing] CfP Semantics, pragmatics, and logic workshop at Biennial of Czech Linguistics 2024
Mojmir Docekal
docekal at phil.muni.cz
Fri Mar 1 09:40:37 CET 2024
Dear all,
please find attached the Call for papers for a workshop Semantics,
pragmatics, and logic workshop at the Biennial of Czech Linguistics 2024
(Prague), organized by Mojmír Dočekal (Masaryk university), Matej
Drobňák (University of Hradec Králové) and Jiří Raclavský (Masaryk
university):
https://bcl2024.ff.cuni.cz/en/workshops/#semantikapragmatika
Abstract submissions (deadline 25.3.2024):
https://bcl2024.ff.cuni.cz/en/call/
Mojmír Dočekal
--
In the 20th century, linguistics was fundamentally influenced by logic,
first with the emergence of formal semantics (Montague 1974), then in
the 1970s–1990s, with the formal-semantic incorporation of modal logic
(Kratzer 1977), followed by the dynamic turn in pragmatics (Kamp and
Reyle 1993) and semantics. Then, after formal semantics and pragmatics
were established, the early 1990s saw the experimental turn that brought
new methods of collecting data and the associated statistical models
necessary to evaluate them (Baayen 2008). These formal-experimental
methods were also applied to Slavic (and also Czech) data; see many
conferences (followed by proceedings) such as FASL and FDSL. These data
have then sometimes become important in contemporary theoretical
linguistic debates, touching the traditional big topics, such as the
meaning of definite descriptions (Šimík and Demian 2020) or the
so-called theories of plurality (TP). TP followed the development of
logical tools for describing the grammatical number and numerals meaning
(Link 1983) and is one of the most influential contemporary
subdisciplines of formal semantics (see Dotlačil 2010; Dočekal and
Wągiel 2021, a.o.). This panel follows both the trend mentioned above
and the Czech linguistics tradition of research on informational
structure (Sgall, Hajičová, and Panevová 1986) or the semantic
investigations of sentences (Daneš 1968, Karlík 1995). This motivates
the choice of topics (see the already mentioned traditional big
questions). At the same time, we welcome modern pragmatic topics such as
the social dimensions of meaning, Bayesian models of interpretation,
presuppositions/implicatures, and formal models of language acquisition.
This list of topics is necessarily incomplete and remains open to all
contributions from (experimental) semantics, pragmatics, logic, and
philosophy of language. The common denominator of the papers should
focus on the relation of natural language to linguistic/logical or
analytical/philosophical problems. The research question of a given
abstract should then address the linguistic data as a tool for moving
our linguistic/logical/linguistic-philosophical investigations forward.
--
doc. PhDr. Mojmír Dočekal, Ph.D.
Associate professor
Department of Linguistics and Baltic Languages
https://www.muni.cz/lide/15952-mojmir-docekal
More information about the PLing
mailing list