[pca] New kernel patch 127127-11

Dominique Frise Dominique.Frise at unil.ch
Tue May 6 07:29:22 CEST 2008


Here below what we noticed about 127127-xx patches.

This "deferred-activation" patch can not be applied on a system with zones in 
multi-user: you have to bring it to single-user.
See http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/sundocs/articles/patch-wn.jsp

All our system with only a global zone could be patched in multi-user (we do 
not have any NFS server on Solaris).


Dominique



Martin Paul wrote:
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 05:00:41PM -0400, Mike Moya wrote:
>>> it appears that if you have a mounted/exported file system this patch
>>> will not install. You get the following error:
>>>
>>> mount: Mount point /var/run/.patchSafeMode/root/home/xxx/a does not 
>>> exist.
>>
>> Interesting.  I installed this via pca on a server that had active NFS
>> mounts (and not in single user mode) -- does that fit in with above?
> 
> Same here, and it worked fine, both for 127127 (sparc) and 127128 (x86). 
> The machines had active NFS mounts, but did not share NFS filesystems.
> 
>> Is your patch actually residing on the NFS server?  I must have missed
>> somthing...
> 
> If so, one should really try to install it from e.g. /tmp instead.
> 
> The README says that the patch should be installed while in single user 
> mode, but all kernel patches say this and still it always worked in 
> multi-user mode; I install all patches on my Solaris 8/9/10 test 
> machines in multi-user mode, and never had problems.
> 
> The README doesn't say anything about problems with NFS mounts/shares, 
> so this might not be the root cause of the error you get.
> 
>>> Therefore forcing the patch get installed in single user mode. It 
>>> just isn't reasonable to have to install
>>> ~150 file servers by hand in single user mode
> 
> I agree, that would be horrible. That's why Sun recommends to use Live 
> Upgrade to install the patches.
> 
> Martin.
> 



More information about the pca mailing list