[pca] New kernel patch 127127-11
Dominique Frise
Dominique.Frise at unil.ch
Tue May 6 07:29:22 CEST 2008
Here below what we noticed about 127127-xx patches.
This "deferred-activation" patch can not be applied on a system with zones in
multi-user: you have to bring it to single-user.
See http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/sundocs/articles/patch-wn.jsp
All our system with only a global zone could be patched in multi-user (we do
not have any NFS server on Solaris).
Dominique
Martin Paul wrote:
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 05:00:41PM -0400, Mike Moya wrote:
>>> it appears that if you have a mounted/exported file system this patch
>>> will not install. You get the following error:
>>>
>>> mount: Mount point /var/run/.patchSafeMode/root/home/xxx/a does not
>>> exist.
>>
>> Interesting. I installed this via pca on a server that had active NFS
>> mounts (and not in single user mode) -- does that fit in with above?
>
> Same here, and it worked fine, both for 127127 (sparc) and 127128 (x86).
> The machines had active NFS mounts, but did not share NFS filesystems.
>
>> Is your patch actually residing on the NFS server? I must have missed
>> somthing...
>
> If so, one should really try to install it from e.g. /tmp instead.
>
> The README says that the patch should be installed while in single user
> mode, but all kernel patches say this and still it always worked in
> multi-user mode; I install all patches on my Solaris 8/9/10 test
> machines in multi-user mode, and never had problems.
>
> The README doesn't say anything about problems with NFS mounts/shares,
> so this might not be the root cause of the error you get.
>
>>> Therefore forcing the patch get installed in single user mode. It
>>> just isn't reasonable to have to install
>>> ~150 file servers by hand in single user mode
>
> I agree, that would be horrible. That's why Sun recommends to use Live
> Upgrade to install the patches.
>
> Martin.
>
More information about the pca
mailing list