[pca] 119788-09
French, David
David_French at intuit.com
Wed Dec 17 19:07:07 CET 2008
Jamen, seems like you may be hitting this issue: Sun Alert 236641,
BugID 6590187
(http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-236641-1).
Your problem sounds like the package information in the contents file
are listing /var/sadm/pkg as a directory, but you instead have a
symlink. This is an issue described in the alert. There example
references /etc/mail/sendmail.cf but it applies to anything that has
changed file types since installation, e.g. a directory is now a
symlink.
--Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at
> [mailto:pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at] On Behalf Of McGranahan, Jamen
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 9:32 AM
> To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
> Subject: Re: [pca] 119788-09
>
> I'm really confused. I cannot even get smpatch to work. It
> keeps looking for /var/sadm/pkg or /var/sadm/patch, and
> neither directory exists on this server. All of our patches
> are in the /apps directory - /apps/sadm/pkg and
> /apps/sadm/patch. I've tried to manually download
> 119788-09.jar and installing it that way, putting the file
> first in /var/sadm/spool - then in /apps/sadm/spool. Using
> smpatch, I get a message stating that 121118-08 is not
> installed. So, I've downloaded that patch and did the same
> and got another message, saying I needed 121453-02. So I
> downloaded that patch and did the same and got another
> message, stating I needed 119574-02 and 119254-06. I've
> downloaded both of these and now smpatch tells me that
> 119574-02 is already installed and 119254-06 is obsolete by a
> currently installed 119254-42. I did try creating a soft link
> to point to the appropriate directory to see if that would
> help (pointing to the /apps directory), but I'm still getting
> error. I've even tried manually running patchadd -
>
> # patchadd -M /apps/sadm/spool 119788-09 Validating patches...
>
> Loading patches installed on the system...
>
> Directory is expected, found link - /var/sadm/pkg.
>
> # patchadd -M /apps/sadm/pkg 119788-09
> Validating patches...
>
> Loading patches installed on the system...
>
> Directory is expected, found link - /var/sadm/pkg.
>
> # patchadd /apps/sadm/spool/119788-09
> Validating patches...
>
> Loading patches installed on the system...
>
> Directory is expected, found link - /var/sadm/pkg.
>
> UGH! I'm not sure what to do now. And I don't understand why
> all of the other patches installed fine. Any advice and/or
> guidance would greatly be appreciated! Thanks!
>
> Jamen McGranahan
> Systems Services Librarian
> Vanderbilt University
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at
> [mailto:pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at] On Behalf Of Martin Paul
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 2:27 AM
> To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
> Subject: Re: [pca] 119788-09
>
> Jamen,
>
> > # pca.pl -i 119788-09
> > ...
> > Cannot check name /var/sadm/pkg.
>
> I haven't seen that error before. It's not from the prepatch
> script in this patch, but from patchadd itself
> (/usr/lib/patch/pdo, actually).
>
> Searching for what it could mean I found e.g.:
>
>
> http://osdir.com/ml/os.solaris.opensolaris.zones/2006-12/msg00039.html
>
> Are you using Solaris Zones on the affected system? Are you
> installing in single-user or multi-user mode? Or is
> /var/sadm/pkg otherwise unusual, like a symbolic link,
> mounted via NFS or similar?
>
> It's strange that all the other patches installed fine, as
> the error seems more like a general issue to me.
>
> Were there kernel patches installed during the first pca run,
> and if so,
>
> did you reboot already?
>
> Martin.
>
>
>
More information about the pca
mailing list