[pca] 6620575 problem with sockfs
Dennis Clarke
dclarke at blastwave.org
Mon Feb 20 15:48:16 CET 2012
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Another fine bit of police work reveals that patch 148601-01 is a
>> security patch but not flagged as "Recommended" which is weird.
>
> As of today's patchdiag.xref file, it *is* marked RECOMMENDED. I think Don
> explained the procedure here once. AFAIR, adding a patch to the Recommended
> Patch Cluster does not necessarily happen at the same time as publishing the
> patch. So seeing some lags here is normal. If you follow the changes in the
> xref
> files closely, you'll see that patches often get marked RECOMMENDED a few days
> after they were first published.
>
> Martin.
Connected to my other email, those oddballs show up when you try
to graph the inter-dependencies.
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dclarke at blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-------------------------+-----------------------------------+
More information about the pca
mailing list