[pca] Non-existing patch

[Thomas Gouverneur]

Isn't it because the 124628-02 is obsolete that it's not inside the
patchdiag.xref ?

-- 
Thomas Gouverneur
 _____           _      
| ____|___ _ __ (_)_  __
|  _| / __| '_ \| \ \/ /
| |___\__ \ |_) | |>  < 
|_____|___/ .__/|_/_/\_\
 Network  |_|       SPRL
   TVA: BE683601811

T: +32 498 23 00 40
W: http://espix.net
M: <thomas at espix.net>


On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:11:28 +0200
Martin Paul <martin at par.univie.ac.at> wrote:

> Hi Don and all,
> 
> In the READMEs of the new patches 124630-60 and 119534-29 a note has
> been added:
> 
>    NOTE: The list of 'patches required with this patch' (above) has
> been modified from the list specified at patch creation time. The
> reason for the modification is that one or more of the required
> patches was either never released or withdrawn after its release. The
> following substitutions (which are guaranteed to satisfy the original
> requirements) were therefore made:
> 
>    124628-03 replaces 126677-02
> 
> This replacement is a good thing, but unfortunately it has only taken
> place in the README and not in the "patchinfo" files nor in
> patchdiag.xref - those still refer to 126677-02 (which, as the note
> says, has never been released). Now PCA has always taken care of that
> by internally replacing 126677-02 with 124628-03 when resolving
> dependencies, so there's no new problem.
> 
> It would be nice, though, now that the problem has been noticed, to
> fix this issue in all places (patch README, patchinfo,
> patchdiag.xref) to make this consistent again.
> 
> The same applies to the corresponding x86 patches, BTW (non-existant
> 126678 required by 124631 and 119535). And just for completeness,
> here is the list of all non-existant patches to be found as required
> patches in patchdiag.xref, and how they are taken care of in PCA:
> 
>    ($r eq "125077-02") && ($r="120011-09"); # 119757
>    ($r eq "125078-02") && ($r="120012-10"); # 119758
>    ($r eq "125486-01") && ($r="120011-14"); # 126206
>    ($r eq "125487-01") && ($r="120012-14"); # 126207
>    ($r eq "114431-03") && ($r="117172-17"); # 116473
> 
> Read like this: Patch 119757 requires 125077-02, which doesn't exist,
> so it should require 120011-09 instead.
> 
> Martin.
>