[pca] PCA Reports
Rajiv Gunja
opn.src.rocks at gmail.com
Thu May 19 23:24:02 CEST 2011
I have never used the big number in the (). What I use is the number of
patches missing.
For a give Xref file (which date you downloaded), PCA gives you all the
missing patches for a server to that date.
@ our company, we set dates for each quarter and use only those Xref files
to patch a server in that quarter.
For your needs, pick an Xref file/date and run PCA list on all the servers
and get the number of patches missing for that date.
If you have more than 20, run a script to download the 3 files to a single
server and run listing on that single server, it will be much faster and you
will have a log of before and after patching configuration.
-GGR
--
Rajiv G Gunja
Blog: http://ossrocks.blogspot.com
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:13, little help <littlehelphere at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am running some reports via PCA and had a quick question about the
> "List:" portion of the output that s generated via PCA. I am trying to
> generate a report of missing patches against all possible patches for a
> host. For example can I get pca to report that I am missing 20 out of a
> possible 200 patches for this host. I need to report what percentage of
> patches are missing from a host.
> From the website it states
> *
> "The header includes some general information about the patchdiag.xref
> file, the host (Host:) and the listed patches (List:). The numbers in
> parantheses are the number of listed patches and the sum of their ages in
> days; when listing missing patches, this is a rough indicator of the current
> patch state."
>
> *Can someone clarify what the sum of patch dates is used for?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.univie.ac.at/pipermail/pca/attachments/20110519/52def076/attachment.html>
More information about the pca
mailing list