[pca] patchdiag.xref for CPU
Jeff
variverrat at gmail.com
Thu Jun 16 15:37:37 CEST 2011
This is awesome Martin, my guess is it might make a patchdiag file more
accurate then the real one since it would use the info that patchadd would
use to decide if it needs to be installed.
I'll give it a test and see if the results match if I installed the CPU from
the bundled install scripts, but I think this is a great solution.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Martin Paul <martin at par.univie.ac.at>wrote:
> After the idea came up to create a special patchdiag.xref which only
> includes the patches of a Critical Patch Cluster (CPU), I couldn't resist
> and gave it a try.
>
> I downloaded the "CPU OS Cluster 2011/04 Solaris 10 SPARC" and hacked up a
> script (mkxref, see attachment) which extracts the necessary information
> from the patch READMEs, patchinfo and pkginfo files and creates a
> patchdiag.xref file. The idea is that this can then be used with PCA to
> patch systems to the state of the CPU without actually having to download
> the +2GB file (on every system).
>
> Take care: The script is mostly untested. It's hard to verify whether the
> patchdiag.xref it creates is 100% correct. It works with PCA, and I've
> compared a few sample patches with their entries in the real xref file, and
> they looked fine. The Recommended/Security flags are missing (they are not
> in the patchinfo file), but this shouldn't matter.
>
> I'm including both the script and the patchdiag.xref file I created from
> the above mentioned CPU. If anybody does some experiments with it, I'd be
> happy to hear about it. Theoretically, one can generate xref files for any
> set of patches with the script, which might be of use in other regards than
> with the CPU as well.
>
> Martin.
>
>
>
>
--
Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.univie.ac.at/pipermail/pca/attachments/20110616/25c6b9ad/attachment.html>
More information about the pca
mailing list