[pca] Corrupted boot_archive

Rajiv Gunja opn.src.rocks at gmail.com
Sat Jul 31 21:27:14 CEST 2010


No, this is not an issue with the patch bundle, but rather the kernel and
the OS design itself. Too many bugs with the latest kernel (142900). It has
jumped from revision -05 in Feb 2010 to -15 in Jul 26 2010.

I have seem some really strange issues since the boot archive was released.
But the good thing about it is, either it works or it does not. So we can
decide if we should patch the OS to a higher level or upgrade the OS using
LU and latest image (Update) directly.

-GGR

--
Rajiv G Gunja
Blog: http://ossrocks.blogspot.com


On 29 July 2010 20:47, Jones, Eric CIV SRF 1236 <Eric.Jones at srf.navy.mil>wrote:

> I'm sorry if I gave the impression that I was referencing to PCA as an
> issue.
> I was wondering if there was an issue with the current patches for Sol
> 10 10/09.
>
>
> Eric R. Jones
> SRF JRMC
> C1236
> DSN 315-243-4196
>
> STICK \'stik\ n. 1: A boomerang that doesn't work.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at
> [mailto:pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at] On Behalf Of Rajiv Gunja
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 9:13 AM
> To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
> Subject: Re: [pca] Corrupted boot_archive
>
> I have seen this happen on many older SPARC servers, which are
> pre-137137-09 patch (which was when the boot-archive was introduced).
> In some cases, I was unable to patch the server using LU. (pre U3 and
> some U3) In some cases, I had to run bootadm command after activating
> the ABE which was patched. When rebooted, it would come up fine without
> issues. (U3 and U4)
>
> If you are patching any server and have the flexibility to have an
> alternate boot disk or ABE, it would very easy to boot it up on the
> unpatched disk, mount the patched disk along with its /var and then run
> bootadm command from the mounted disk.
> (mount /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 /a ; mount /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s6 /a/var ;
> /a/usr/sbin/bootadm update-archive -R /a )
>
> These issues have nothing to do with PCA, but to do with the boot
> archive and their design. If one is going through multiple levels of
> kernel versions (not revisions), this is to be expected.
>
> -GGR
>
> --
> Rajiv G Gunja
> Blog: http://ossrocks.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> On 29 July 2010 18:07, Jones, Eric CIV SRF 1236
> <Eric.Jones at srf.navy.mil> wrote:
>
>
>        Well I got the problem fixed, this time when it asked me if I
> wanted to mount /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 to /a I said no.
>        I didn't get any reply that the attempt was successful just
> returned to the '#' prompt where I typed in bootadm update-archive. This
> didn't return anything either so I did an "init 6" and it came right
> back up.
>        I'll monitor this for a bit before cloning the backup drive.
>        Got to test Oracle to make sure it comes up.
>        If anyone else has an issue with this patch series, I'll go on
> limb and say it's a kernel patch, please let me know what you have found
> out.
>
>
>
>         Eric R. Jones
>        SRF JRMC
>        C1236
>        DSN 315-243-4196
>
>        STICK \'stik\ n. 1: A boomerang that doesn't work.
>
>        -----Original Message-----
>        From: pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at
> [mailto:pca-bounces at lists.univie.ac.at] On Behalf Of Jones, Eric CIV SRF
> 1236
>        Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 7:00 AM
>        To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
>        Subject: [pca] Corrupted boot_archive
>
>
>        Howdy everyone, I just recently started using PCA again after
> having so much trouble getting it to download and install patches.
>        I upgraded 2 boxes, one a sparc and one an X86, to 10 10/09.
>        I patched the SPARC and rebooted and was faced with an ugly
> "unable to create boot_archive" error which destroyed the FS. I tried
> using boot -F failsafe and spent 45 minutes hitting "y" until I just
> gave up swapped with the clone and dd'd back to health.
>        I have patched my other systems with pca 201006, no the current
> release, with no problem.
>        Any one else have an issue with the latest SPARC patches?
>        By the way I also did it with updatemanager with the same
> results.
>
>         Eric R. Jones
>        SRF JRMC
>        C1236
>        DSN 315-243-4196
>
>        STICK \'stik\ n. 1: A boomerang that doesn't work.
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.univie.ac.at/mailman/private/pca/attachments/20100731/6780d94c/attachment.html 


More information about the pca mailing list