[pca] PCA not reporting on patches that may need to be re-installed
Norman Lyon
norman.lyon at gmail.com
Mon Mar 23 17:25:37 CET 2009
Wait.... Can't we just drop the '.$ARCH' concern and look at the REV=
part of the VERSION? From my initial checking, I'm seeing that the
multiple package names are showing up with different versions.......
Just picking 137111-08 out of an old patchdiag.xref and noticing the
patch itself, I notice:
root[ksh]@idgaf2> ls -d $PATCHDIR/137111-08/SUNWcakr.*|sed 's,.*/,,'
SUNWcakr.u
SUNWcakr.us
SUNWcakr.v
root[ksh]@idgaf2>
137111|08|Oct/08/08|R|S| |
|10|sparc;sparc.sun4u;sparc.sun4us;sparc.sun4v;118833-36;119578-30;120011-14;126897-02;127127-11;127755-01;|FJSVfmd:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.20.17.25;FJSVhea:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.20.17.25;FJSVmdb:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.20.17.25;FJSVmdbr:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.20.17.25;SUNWarcr:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWcakr:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.20.17.25;SUNWcakr:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWcakr:11.10.0,REV=2005.08.25.02.12;SUNWcart200:11.10.0,REV=2005.08.10.02.13;SUNWckr:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWcsd:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWcsl:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWcslr:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWcsr:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWcsu:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWdtrc:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWesu:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWfmd:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWhea:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWkvm:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.20.17.25;SUNWkvm:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWkvm:11.10.0,REV=2005.08.04.12.25;SUNWkvmt200:11.10.0,REV=2005.08.10.02.13;SUNWmdb:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWmdbr:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWnfsckr:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWnfscu:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWopenssl-libraries:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWtoo:11.10.0,REV=2005.01.21.15.53;SUNWust1:11.10.0,REV=2005.08.10.02.13;SUNWust2:11.10.0,REV=2007.07.08.17.44;|SunOS
5.10: kernel patch
Would I be able to count on the REV part of the version to always
match up with what I have installed, and still make use of the
patchdiag.xref? On the flip side, if I could do this, could PCA do it
as well? Or, am I missing something extremely obvious?
More information about the pca
mailing list